Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2015-03-25

Differentiation of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus from Poniciri Trifoliatae Fructus Immaturus using flow-injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) metabolic fingerprinting method combined with chemometrics.

Yang Zhao, Yuan-Shiun Chang, Pei Chen

Index: J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 107 , 251-7, (2015)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

A flow-injection mass spectrometric metabolic fingerprinting method in combination with chemometrics was used to differentiate Aurantii Fructus Immaturus from its counterfeit Poniciri Trifoliatae Fructus Immaturus. Flow-injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) fingerprints of 9 Aurantii Fructus Immaturus samples and 12 Poniciri Trifoliatae Fructus Immaturus samples were acquired and analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA). The authentic herbs were differentiated from their counterfeits easily. Eight characteristic components which were responsible for the differences between the samples were tentatively identified. Furthermore, three out of the eight components, naringin, hesperidin, and neohesperidin, were quantified. The results are useful to help identify the authenticity of Aurantii Fructus Immaturus. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Related Compounds

Structure Name/CAS No. Articles
Formic Acid Structure Formic Acid
CAS:64-18-6
Acetonitrile Structure Acetonitrile
CAS:75-05-8
Methanol Structure Methanol
CAS:67-56-1
ndsb-256 Structure ndsb-256
CAS:81239-45-4
(-)-p-Chloroamphetamine hydrochloride Structure (-)-p-Chloroamphetamine hydrochloride
CAS:3706-38-5
PERCHLORIC ACID Structure PERCHLORIC ACID
CAS:7601-90-3