Physics of Life Reviews 2018-04-02

Physics of mind: Experimental confirmations of theoretical predictions

Félix Schoeller, Leonid Perlovsky, Dmitry Arseniev

Index: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.021

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

What is common among Newtonian mechanics, statistical physics, thermodynamics, quantum physics, the theory of relativity, astrophysics and the theory of superstrings? All these areas of physics have in common a methodology, which is discussed in the first few lines of the review. Is a physics of the mind possible? Is it possible to describe how a mind adapts in real time to changes in the physical world through a theory based on a few basic laws? From perception and elementary cognition to emotions and abstract ideas allowing high-level cognition and executive functioning, at nearly all levels of study, the mind shows variability and uncertainties. Is it possible to turn psychology and neuroscience into so-called “hard” sciences? This review discusses several established first principles for the description of mind and their mathematical formulations. A mathematical model of mind is derived from these principles. This model includes mechanisms of instincts, emotions, behavior, cognition, concepts, language, intuitions, and imagination. We clarify fundamental notions such as the opposition between the conscious and the unconscious, the knowledge instinct and aesthetic emotions, as well as humans' universal abilities for symbols and meaning. In particular, the review discusses in length evolutionary and cognitive functions of aesthetic emotions and musical emotions. Several theoretical predictions are derived from the model, some of which have been experimentally confirmed. These empirical results are summarized and we introduce new theoretical developments. Several unsolved theoretical problems are proposed, as well as new experimental challenges for future research.

Latest Articles:

Shock wave–induced permeabilization of mammalian cells

2018-03-21

[10.1016/j.plrev.2018.03.001]

How much free energy is absorbed upon breaking DNA base pairs?: Comment on “DNA melting and energetics of the double helix” by Maxim Frank-Kamenetskii et al.

2018-03-07

[10.1016/j.plrev.2018.03.008]

Modelling thrombosis in silico: frontiers, challenges, unresolved problems and milestones

2018-03-05

[10.1016/j.plrev.2018.02.005]

At the root of the paradox: Comment on “An integrative review of the enjoyment of sadness associated with music” by Tuomas Eerola et al.

2017-12-28

[10.1016/j.plrev.2017.12.008]

An Integrative Review of the Enjoyment of Sadness Associated with Music

2017-11-23

[10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.016]

More Articles...