Experimental hepatic uroporphyria induced by the diphenyl-ether herbicide fomesafen in male DBA/2 mice.
Jan Krijt, Oskar Psenák, Martin Vokurka, Alena Chlumská, Frantisek Fakan
Index: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 189(1) , 28-38, (2003)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
Hepatic uroporphyria can be readily induced by a variety of treatments in mice of the C57BL strains, whereas DBA/2 mice are almost completely resistant. However, feeding of the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide fomesafen (0.25% in the diet for 18 weeks) induced hepatic uroporphyria in male DBA/2N mice (liver porphyrin content up to 150 nmol/g, control animals 1 nmol/g), whereas fomesafen-treated male C57BL/6N mice displayed only a slight elevation of liver porphyrins (approximately 5 nmol/g). The profile of accumulated hepatic porphyrins in fomesafen-treated DBA/2N mice resembled the well-characterised uroporphyria induced by polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons, while histological examination confirmed the presence of uroporphyria-specific cytoplasmic inclusions in the hepatocytes. Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase activity decreased to about 30% of control values in fomesafen-treated DBA/2N mice; microsomal methoxyresorufin O-dealkylase activity was slightly reduced. The amount of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 mRNA, as determined by real-time PCR, was not significantly changed; mRNA encoding the housekeeping 5-aminolevulinic acid synthase was elevated 10-fold. Total liver iron was slightly increased. A similar uroporphyria was induced by the herbicide formulation Blazer, containing a structurally related herbicide acifluorfen, when fed to DBA/2N mice at a dose corresponding to 0.25% of acifluorfen in the diet. Since DBA/2 mice are almost completely resistant to all well-characterised porphyrogenic chemicals, the results suggest the possible existence of a yet unknown mechanism of uroporphyria induction, to which the DBA/2 mouse strain is more sensitive than the C57BL strain.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
1995-12-01
[Obes. Res. 3 Suppl 5 , 785S-788S, (1995)]
2011-10-01
[Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 87(4) , 420-5, (2011)]
2008-07-01
[Cell Tissue Res. 333(1) , 147-58, (2008)]
2003-03-01
[Chronobiol. Int. 20(2) , 299-324, (2003)]
2009-03-01
[Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 72(3) , 802-10, (2009)]