Dental Materials Journal 2012-02-03

Radiopacity of different resin-based and conventional luting cements compared to human and bovine teeth.

Gürel Pekkan, Mutlu Ozcan

Index: Dent. Mater. J. 31(1) , 68-75, (2012)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

This study evaluated the radiopacity of different resin-based luting materials and compared the results to human and bovine dental hard tissues. Disc specimens (N=130, n=10 per group) (diameter: 6 mm, thickness: 1 mm) were prepared from 10 resin-based and 3 conventional luting cements. Human canine dentin (n=10), bovine enamel (n=10), bovine dentin (n=10) and Aluminium (Al) step wedge were used as references. The optical density values of each material were measured from radiographic images using a transmission densitometer. Al step wedge thickness and optical density values were plotted and equivalent Al thickness values were determined for radiopacity measurements of each material. The radiopacity values of conventional cements and two resin luting materials (Rely X Unicem and Variolink II), were significantly higher than that of bovine enamel that could be preferred for restorations cemented on enamel. Since all examined resin-based luting materials showed radiopacity values equivalent to or greater than that of human and bovine dentin, they could be considered suitable for the restorations cemented on dentin.


Related Compounds

  • Zinc phosphate

Related Articles:

Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.

2011-01-01

[Pediatr. Dent. 33(7) , 501-4, (2011)]

Survival of two post systems--five-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

2011-01-01

[Quintessence Int. 42(10) , 843-50, (2011)]

The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.

2011-11-01

[J. Prosthet. Dent. 106(5) , 328-36, (2011)]

Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study.

2013-01-01

[Int. J. Prosthodont. 26(1) , 82-4, (2013)]

Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.

2012-02-01

[J. Prosthet. Dent. 107(2) , 80-5, (2012)]

More Articles...