Antibiotic prophylaxis for ED patients with simple hand lacerations: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.
Nicole Berwald, Feras Khan, Shahriar Zehtabchi
Index: Am. J. Emerg. Med. 32(7) , 768-71, (2014)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
The benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis for simple hand lacerations (lacerations that do not involve special structures) has not been adequately studied.To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to determine the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency department (ED) patients with simple hand lacerations.Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial in 2 urban academic EDs. Adult (≥18 years old) patients with simple hand lacerations were randomized to cephalexin, 500 mg; clindamycin, 300 mg; or placebo (every 6 hours for 7 days, all in identical capsules).(1) feasibility determined by the number of patients who agreed to enroll and number of patients who completed follow-up, (2) infection rate (determined by 2 physicians at 10-14 days), (3) satisfaction with wound appearance (measured by a visual analogue scale at 30 days via phone). Medians, quartiles, and percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to present data. Groups were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests, when appropriate.Over a 5-month period, 123 patients were approached, and 78 consented to enrollment (63%; 95% CI, 55-71%). Five were lost to follow-up (5/78, 6%; 95% CI, 2%-14%). Only one patient had infection on follow-up for an infection rate of 1% (95% CI, 0.01%-8%). Patient's satisfaction with wound appearance did not differ among the groups.The findings of this pilot study support the feasibility of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. The low rate of infection suggests the need of a large sample size for the trial.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2015-02-01
[APMIS 123(2) , 156-62, (2015)]
2015-02-01
[PLoS Pathog. 11(2) , e1004645, (2015)]
2014-09-01
[Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840(9) , 2851-61, (2014)]
2015-08-15
[Food Chem. 181 , 119-26, (2015)]
2014-08-30
[Mar. Pollut. Bull. 85(2) , 391-9, (2014)]