Surface density mapping of natural tissue by a scanning haptic microscope (SHM).
Takeshi Moriwaki, Tomonori Oie, Keiichi Takamizawa, Yoshinobu Murayama, Toru Fukuda, Sadao Omata, Yasuhide Nakayama
Index: J. Med. Eng. Technol. 37(2) , 96-101, (2013)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
To expand the performance capacity of the scanning haptic microscope (SHM) beyond surface mapping microscopy of elastic modulus or topography, surface density mapping of a natural tissue was performed by applying a measurement theory of SHM, in which a frequency change occurs upon contact of the sample surface with the SHM sensor - a microtactile sensor (MTS) that vibrates at a pre-determined constant oscillation frequency. This change was mainly stiffness-dependent at a low oscillation frequency and density-dependent at a high oscillation frequency. Two paragon examples with extremely different densities but similar macroscopic elastic moduli in the range of natural soft tissues were selected: one was agar hydrogels and the other silicon organogels with extremely low (less than 25 mg/cm(3)) and high densities (ca. 1300 mg/cm(3)), respectively. Measurements were performed in saline solution near the second-order resonance frequency, which led to the elastic modulus, and near the third-order resonance frequency. There was little difference in the frequency changes between the two resonance frequencies in agar gels. In contrast, in silicone gels, a large frequency change by MTS contact was observed near the third-order resonance frequency, indicating that the frequency change near the third-order resonance frequency reflected changes in both density and elastic modulus. Therefore, a density image of the canine aortic wall was subsequently obtained by subtracting the image observed near the second-order resonance frequency from that near the third-order resonance frequency. The elastin-rich region had a higher density than the collagen-rich region.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2013-12-01
[J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 9(12) , 1972-83, (2013)]
2014-10-17
[Int. J. Food Microbiol. 189 , 82-8, (2014)]
2011-01-01
[Mol. Cancer 10 , 76, (2011)]
2013-09-01
[J. Bacteriol. 195(18) , 4020-36, (2013)]
2015-08-15
[Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 , 5639-49, (2015)]