Der Hautarzt 2011-10-01

[Current contact allergens].

J Geier, W Uter, H Lessmann, A Schnuch

Index: Hautarzt 62(10) , 751-6, (2011)

Full Text: HTML

Abstract

Ever-changing exposure to contact allergens, partly due to statutory directives (e.g. nickel, chromate, methyldibromo glutaronitrile) or recommendations from industrial associations (e.g. hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde), requires on-going epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergy. In this paper, the current state with special focus in fragrances and preservatives is described on the basis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) of the year 2010. In 2010, 12,574 patients were patch tested in the dermatology departments belonging to the IVDK. Nickel is still the most frequent contact allergen. However the continuously improved EU nickel directive already has some beneficial effect; sensitization frequency in young women is dropping. In Germany, chromate-reduced cement has been in use now for several years, leading to a decline in chromate sensitization in brick-layers. Two fragrance mixes are part of the German baseline series; they are still relevant. The most important fragrances in these mixes still are oak moss absolute and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. However, in relation to these leading allergens, sensitization frequency to other fragrances contained in the mixes seems to be increasing. Among the preservatives, MCI/MI has not lost its importance as contact allergen, in contrast to MDBGN. Sources of MCI/MI sensitization obviously are increasingly found in occupational context. Methylisothiazolinone is a significant allergen in occupational settings, and less frequently in body care products.


Related Compounds

  • Methyldibromo glut...
  • 4-(4-Hydroxy-4-met...

Related Articles:

Allergy to methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol (Euxyl k 400): regulatory issues, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management.

2011-05-01

[Dermatitis 22(3) , 127-40, (2011)]

Can exposure limitations for well-known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose-response patch test data.

2011-06-01

[Contact Dermatitis 64(6) , 337-42, (2011)]

Hand dermatitis: a focus on allergic contact dermatitis to biocides.

2009-07-01

[Dermatol. Clin. 27(3) , 251-64, v-vi, (2009)]

Follow-up of the monitored levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe: overview of the years 2001-2008.

2012-11-01

[Contact Dermatitis 67(5) , 312-4, (2012)]

Temporal trends of preservative allergy in Denmark (1985-2008).

2010-02-01

[Contact Dermatitis 62(2) , 102-8, (2010)]

More Articles...