gamma-Glutamyltranspeptidase-catalysed acyl-transfer to the added acceptor does not proceed via the ping-pong mechanism.
Gololobov MYu, R C Bateman
Index: Biochem. J. 304 ( Pt 3) , 869-76, (1994)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
Acyl-transfer catalysed by gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase from bovine kidney was studied using gamma-L- and gamma-D-Glu-p-nitroanilide as the donor and GlyGly as the acceptor. The transfer of the gamma-Glu group to GlyGly was shown to be accompanied by transfer of the gamma-Glu group to water (hydrolysis). The results were compared with acyl-transfer catalysed by the representative serine protease, alpha-chymotrypsin. The main difference between the kinetic mechanism of the acyl-transfer reactions catalysed by these enzymes, which contain an active-site serine and form an acyl-enzyme intermediate but belong to different enzyme classes, was found to consist in the role of the enzyme-donor-acceptor complex. This complex is not formed at any acceptor concentrations in the acyl-transfer reactions catalysed by the serine proteases. In contrast, in the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-catalysed acyl-transfer the pathway going through the ternary enzyme-donor-acceptor complex formed from the enzyme-acceptor complex becomes the main pathway of the transfer reaction even at moderate acceptor concentrations. As a result, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase catalysis follows a sequential mechanism with random equilibrium addition of the substrates and ordered release of the products. The second distinction concerns the inhibitory effect of the acceptor. In the case of alpha-chymotrypsin this was the result of true inhibition, i.e. a dead-end formation of the enzyme-acceptor complex. A salt effect caused by the acceptor was the rationale of a similar effect observed in acyl-transfer catalysed by gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2013-04-25
[Chem. Biol. Interact. 203(2) , 480-5, (2013)]
2015-05-01
[J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 149 , 118-27, (2015)]
2012-06-01
[J. Food Sci. 77(6) , C640-5, (2012)]
2001-02-09
[Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1545(1-2) , 184-91, (2001)]
1998-09-01
[Eur. J. Biochem. 256(2) , 297-302, (1998)]