Differential induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase by anti-carcinogenic organosulfides from garlic.
S V Singh, S S Pan, S K Srivastava, H Xia, X Hu, H A Zaren, J L Orchard
Index: Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244(3) , 917-20, (1998)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
This study was undertaken to elucidate the mechanism of organ specificity and differential efficacy of garlic organosulfides (OSCs) [diallyl sulfide (DAS), diallyl disulfide (DADS), diallyl trisulfide (DATS), dipropyl sulfide (DPS) and dipropyl disulfide (DPDS)] in preventing benzo(a)pyrene (BP)-induced tumorigenesis in mice. The results of the present study reveal a good correlation between chemopreventive efficacies of garlic OSCs and their inductive effects on the expression of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO), an enzyme implicated in the detoxification of activated quinone metabolites of BP. Treatment of mice with DADS and DATS, which are potent inhibitors of BP-induced forestomach tumorigenesis, resulted in a statistically significant increase (2.4- and 1.5-fold, respectively) in forestomach NQO activity. In addition, DADS and DATS were much more potent inducers of forestomach NQO activity than DAS, which is a weak inhibitor of BP-induced forestomach tumorigenesis than the former compounds. Propyl-group containing OSCs (DPS and DPDS), which do not inhibit BP-induced tumorigenesis, did not affect forestomach NQO activity. Similar to forestomach, a good correlation was also observed between effects of these OSCs against BP-induced pulmonary tumorigenesis and their effects on NQO expression in the lung. For example, treatment of mice with DAS, which is a potent inhibitor of BP-induced pulmonary tumorigenesis, resulted in about 3.2-fold increase in pulmonary NQO activity. On the other hand, this activity was increased by about 1.5-fold upon DATS administration, which does not inhibit BP-induced cancer of the lung. In conclusion, our results suggest that induction of NQO may be important in anti-cancer effects of garlic OSCs.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2014-08-22
[J. Chromatogr. A. 1356 , 221-9, (2014)]
2014-06-11
[J. Agric. Food Chem. 62(23) , 5296-304, (2014)]
2009-07-01
[J. Appl. Toxicol. 29(5) , 403-13, (2009)]
2008-05-09
[Chem. Biol. Interact. 173(1) , 9-18, (2008)]
1992-03-01
[Rev. Esp. Fisiol. 48(1) , 59-60, (1992)]