Requirements for mammalian carboxylesterase inhibition by substituted ethane-1,2-diones.
Elizabeth I Parkinson, M Jason Hatfield, Lyudmila Tsurkan, Janice L Hyatt, Carol C Edwards, Latorya D Hicks, Bing Yan, Philip M Potter
Index: Bioorg. Med. Chem. 19 , 4635-43, (2011)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
Carboxylesterases (CE) are ubiquitous enzymes found in both human and animal tissues and are responsible for the metabolism of xenobiotics. This includes numerous natural products, as well as a many clinically used drugs. Hence, the activity of these agents is likely dependent upon the levels and location of CE expression. We have recently identified benzil is a potent inhibitor of mammalian CEs, and in this study, we have assessed the ability of analogues of this compound to inhibit these enzymes. Three different classes of molecules were assayed: one containing different atoms vicinal to the carbonyl carbon atom and the benzene ring [PhXC(O)C(O)XPh, where X=CH₂, CHBr, N, S, or O]; a second containing a panel of alkyl 1,2-diones demonstrating increasing alkyl chain length; and a third consisting of a series of 1-phenyl-2-alkyl-1,2-diones. In general, with the former series of molecules, heteroatoms resulted in either loss of inhibitory potency (when X=N), or conversion of the compounds into substrates for the enzymes (when X=S or O). However, the inclusion of a brominated methylene atom resulted in potent CE inhibition. Subsequent analysis with the alkyl diones [RC(O)C(O)R, where R ranged from CH₃ to C₈H₁₇] and 1-phenyl-2-alkyl-1,2-diones [PhC(O)C(O)R where R ranged from CH₃ to C₆H₁₃], demonstrated that the potency of enzyme inhibition directly correlated with the hydrophobicity (clogP) of the molecules. We conclude from these studies that that the inhibitory power of these 1,2-dione derivatives depends primarily upon the hydrophobicity of the R group, but also on the electrophilicity of the carbonyl group.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2005-04-21
[J. Med. Chem. 48 , 2906-15, (2005)]
2002-06-01
[Acta Odontol. Scand. 60(3) , 146-50, (2002)]
1996-07-01
[Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 331(1) , 48-54, (1996)]
2012-10-01
[J. Dent. 40(10) , 836-42, (2012)]
2010-09-02
[J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol. 100(3) , 128-34, (2010)]