Acta Radiologica 2002-11-01

Influence of two non-ionic radiographic contrast media with different osmolalities on coagulation in invasive cardiology. A prospective, randomised comparative study.

S G Spitzer, G Pindur, U Gerk, F Jung

文献索引：Acta radiol. 43(6) , 617-22, (2002)

全文：HTML全文

摘要

To investigate the influence of two non-ionic radiographic contrast media with different osmolality on thrombocytic function and the plasmatic coagulation system.The study was carried out as a randomised, prospective, comparative study with two contrast media in a heart catheter laboratory.Activating influences on platelet aggregation, procoagulatory or profibrinolytic functions or injury to the endothelium could be ruled out. Apparently, also differences in substance properties, such as the media's ionic character or osmolality had no demonstrable influence on the interaction with haemostatis and blood vessels. An adjuvant, antithrombotic therapy was carried out, which consisted of platelet aggregation inhibitors and heparins.Our findings agree with the results of recent clinical trials, which demonstrated no relevant disadvantage of non-ionic contrast media as regards thrombotic complications.

相关化合物

  • 碘喷托

相关文献：

Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.

2007-01-01

[Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 30(3) , 376-82, (2007)]

[Determination of the distribution volume of contrast media solutions injected intrahepatically: pre-pilot studies for intratumoral gene therapy].

2002-03-01

[Rofo. 174(3) , 357-62, (2002)]

Low-high and high-low biphasic injection forms in computed tomography examinations of the upper abdomen.

2006-02-01

[Acta radiol. 47(1) , 10-4, (2006)]

Cerebral CT angiography using a small volume of concentrated contrast material with a test injection method: optimal scan delay for quantitative and qualitative performance.

2012-09-01

[Br. J. Radiol. 85(1017) , e748-55, (2012)]

[Severe reactions to iodinated contrast agents: is anaphylaxis responsible?].

2001-09-01

[J. Radiol. 82(9 Pt 1) , 973-7, (2001)]

更多文献...