[BeO-OSL detectors for dose measurements in cell cultures].
M Andreeff, D Sommer, R Freudenberg, U Reichelt, J Henniger, J Kotzerke
Index: Nuklearmedizin. 48(6) , 227-32, (2009)
Full Text: HTML
Abstract
The absorbed dose is an important parameter in experiments involving irradiation of cells in vitro with unsealed radionuclides. Typically, this is estimated with a model calculation, although the results thus obtained cannot be verified. Generally used real-time measurement methods are not applicable in this setting. A new detector material with in vitro suitability is the subject of this work.Optically-stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters based on beryllium oxide (BeO) were used for dose measurement in cell cultures exposed to unsealed radionuclides. Their qualitative properties (e. g. energy-dependent count rate sensitivity, fading, contamination by radioactive liquids) were determined and compared to the results of a Monte Carlo simulation (using AMOS software). OSL dosimeters were tested in common cell culture setups with a known geometry.Dose reproducibility of the OSL dosimeters was +/-1.5%. Fading at room temperature was 0.07% per day. Dose loss (optically-stimulated deletion) under ambient lighting conditions was 0.5% per minute. The Monte Carlo simulation for the relative sensitivity at different beta energies provided corresponding results to those obtained with the OSL dosimeters. Dose profile measurements using a 6 well plate and 14 ml PP tube showed that the geometry of the cell culture vessel has a marked influence on dose distribution with 188Re.A new dosimeter system was calibrated with beta-emitters of different energy. It turned out as suitable for measuring dose in liquids. The dose profile measurements obtained are suitably precise to be used as a check against theoretical dose calculations.
Related Compounds
Related Articles:
2009-12-01
[J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 6(12) , 735-44, (2009)]
2002-01-01
[Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 100(1-4) , 403-6, (2002)]
2011-10-01
[J. Occup. Environ. Med. 53(10) , 1187-93, (2011)]
2005-04-01
[Exp. Lung Res. 31(3) , 341-60, (2005)]
2012-02-01
[J. Environ. Monit. 14(2) , 391-401, (2012)]